This post may contain affiliate links. Please read our disclosure for more information.
I haven’t been watching the news, but I have no doubt that our government’s response to the coronavirus has been nothing short of a ham-fisted joke. I mean, c’mon. We haven’t won a war decisively since 1945, our public schools pump out the most costly educated dunces the world has ever seen, and our national debt now exceeds twenty-three trillion dollars.
And a government with this track record is going to handle a deadly new virus with aplomb? Give me a break.
But here’s a twist for you. Maybe our government isn’t as inept as I suppose. Right now, 78 percent of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck. This, in turn, means that because of the coronavirus, our government now has to figure out how to save 258 million Americans from financial oblivion. And it has to figure it out in a couple of weeks.
What if our paycheck-to-paycheck numbers were reversed, however? What if 78 percent of Americans had a six-month emergency fund? Do you think our government’s response to the coronavirus might be a tad better if it only needed to save 73 million Americans from financial oblivion rather than 258 million Americans?
It is no doubt soothing to blame our coronavirus woes on a butthead president and all those butthead governors and mayors, but truth be told, our government largely sucks because we largely suck. A people who can’t manage their lives themselves cannot reasonably expect a government to manage their lives for them. A government can only do so much wet-nursing.
Okay, groovy freedomist, that’s my curmudgeon spiel for the week. Peace.

Leave a Reply to Mr. Groovy Cancel reply