This post may contain affiliate links. Please read our disclosure for more information.
Last week I came across a New York Times article that showed success on the SAT tracked very well with family income. Children from wealthy families were far more likely to score 1300 or higher than children from poor families. (Because the New York Times has a pay wall, I provided some pertinent data points from the source study and a link to the source study below.)
| Parent Income Percentile | 10-20 | 30-40 | 50-60 | 70-80 | 90-95 | 0.1 |
| Percentage of SAT-Takers Who Had a Score 1300 or Higher | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.4 | 5.3 | 13.8 | 33.1 |
Also last week, I came across Lil RT on YouTube. Here’s the six-year-old rapping about “hoes sucking dick.”
Now some observations: I don’t think Lil RT lives in a high-income household, and I don’t think Lil RT is going to grow up and score 1300 or higher on the SAT. I also don’t think that any children from the 0.1 income households are rapping about “hoes sucking dick.” Something tells me their parents don’t tolerate such boorish, low-class behavior. Something also tells me their parents don’t tolerate imprudence. They make damn sure their children reach adulthood with a solid grounding in math and English.
My point here isn’t to pick on Lil RT. He’s screwed. And he’s not being screwed by the SAT or income inequality. He’s being screwed by a family and community that have adopted a subprime culture. Nope, my point here is that the SAT is more of a culture test than a wealth test. The SAT is nothing but a glorified algebra and reading comprehension test. All one needs to do well on it is learn algebra and get comfortable reading big-boy words, sentences, and rhetoric. And that doesn’t require any money. Libraries and the Khan Academy are free.

Leave a Reply to steve poling Cancel reply